Three posts · September and October 2010 · Restored record
The three entries the blog carried
GamerTrolls.com was a 2010 WordPress.com gaming blog with the tagline Whatever Fanboy, That Game Sucks. The restored record concerns the short run represented by three dated entries from September and October 2010. Their titles, bylines, comment totals and visible page furniture establish a compact publication history without reproducing the writing that appeared beneath the headings.
The material belongs to GamerTrolls.com, not to this page. The restored publication record is not operated by the former blog or connected with it, and it does not publish posts, accept comments or carry messages to anyone. The record keeps the distinction clear by describing what the stored pages show while leaving out every entry body and every comment body.
A title and date can still reveal the shape of a short-run blog. One entry counted activity around a gaming news account, one printed a sharply negative game review, and one recorded a complaint about a new release. The entries also show how responses accumulated beneath them. Their surviving presentation gives useful boundaries, while the missing body text prevents claims beyond those boundaries.
The three titles and their dates
The captured blog lists three entries. Biggest Gaming Troll of All-Time carries the date October 4, 2010. Review: Spiderman Shattered Dimensions and Halo: Reach- WTF Bungie? both carry September 13, 2010. All three appear under Uncategorized and use the gamertrolls author account, placing the entries within the same brief publishing period.
The titles alone separate the blog's subjects and tone. The October heading points toward a person or account being singled out. The Spiderman heading identifies a review. The Halo heading signals a complaint aimed at Bungie. The table records these distinctions alongside the dates, so readers can see the outline without treating a title as a full argument.
The complaint about one forum account
Biggest Gaming Troll of All-Time is the October 4 entry. Its stored figures concern comments associated with one account on a gaming news website. The entry says 50 comments from September were printed, that the account posted 144 comments during that month, and that 10 more appeared in the first three days of October.
The same entry also says 90 additional comments were left unposted. Those figures describe what the entry counted, not an independently established assessment of the account or its conduct. A single response is shown beneath the entry, dated January 19, 2011. The account's screen name is deliberately omitted from this record.
- The entry is dated October 4, 2010.
- Its subject is one account on a gaming news website.
- It counted 50 comments printed from September.
- It reported 144 comments posted during September.
- It added 10 comments from October's first three days.
- It said 90 further comments were left unposted.
| Biggest Gaming Troll of All-Time, October 4, 2010 | A complaint about one account on a gaming news website. The entry printed 50 of that account's September comments, said the same account had posted 144 comments that month and 10 more in the first three days of October, and said 90 further comments were left unposted. One response from a reader was printed under it, dated January 19, 2011. |
|---|---|
| Review: Spiderman Shattered Dimensions, September 13, 2010 | A review signed by the Blue Troll, two sentences long, advising the reader to play a different game instead and closing with a score of minus infinity out of ten. Two responses were printed under it. |
| Halo: Reach- WTF Bungie?, September 13, 2010 | A complaint signed by the Blue Troll, opening with a first-person line that the campaign had been finished in about four and a half hours and the copy thrown away. Three responses were printed under it. |
The review and its printed score line
Review: Spiderman Shattered Dimensions is dated September 13, 2010 and is signed by the Blue Troll. The stored description identifies it as two sentences long and says that it advised readers to play a different game. That summary conveys the entry's direction without reproducing either sentence from the original page.
At the end, the page printed a score of minus infinity out of ten. This is a line belonging to the archived review, not a rating assigned by the restored record. Two responses appear below the entry, one from SBNova dated September 13, 2010 and one from the Blue Troll dated September 14, 2010.
The entry about a new release
Halo: Reach- WTF Bungie? is also dated September 13, 2010 and is signed by the Blue Troll. Its surviving description records a first-person statement that the campaign was finished in about four and a half hours, followed by a statement that the copy was thrown away. The record reports those actions without extending them into a new review.
The title and opening detail make this entry different from the Spiderman review. It presents a complaint about a new release and gives a claimed play duration, while the stored page shows three responses below it. The available material does not provide those response bodies, so their arguments, agreements and disagreements cannot be reconstructed here.
What the responses under the entries show
The response totals vary across the three entries. The October entry has one printed response. The Spiderman review has two. The Halo entry has three. These counts are page-level facts about visible response furniture, not a measure of readership, approval or the importance of any entry.
Names and dates are available for the responses where the stored page prints them, but their wording is not reproduced. The October response is associated with ihatetrolls and dated January 19, 2011. The review responses are associated with SBNova and the Blue Troll, dated September 13 and September 14, 2010. No response figure beyond these entries is added.
Reading three entries as a record
Taken together, the entries show what a short-run gaming blog got through in a few weeks: a counted dispute about comment activity, a deliberately severe game review, and a complaint about Halo: Reach. The About page describes a joint effort by the Blue Troll and the Pink Troll, and says both had written for videogame media outlets in the past. That context identifies the site's stated authorship without turning the entries into outside reporting.
The stored copies stop short of a complete conversation. They preserve headings, dates, author details, selected counts, score presentation and response totals, but not any entry body, comment body or third-party forum post. The record therefore repeats the structure and limited descriptions supported by the pages. It does not recreate the arguments, add a rating or infer reader opinion.
Frequently asked questions
Which entries did the blog publish?
The record shows three entries: Biggest Gaming Troll of All-Time, dated October 4, 2010; Review: Spiderman Shattered Dimensions, dated September 13, 2010; and Halo: Reach- WTF Bungie?, also dated September 13, 2010. All three use the gamertrolls author account and appear under Uncategorized.
What did the October 4 entry count?
It counted 50 comments printed from September, 144 comments posted by the same account during September, and 10 more during the first three days of October. It also said that 90 further comments had been left unposted. These are figures shown by that entry, not new measurements added here.
What score did the review print?
Review: Spiderman Shattered Dimensions printed a closing score of minus infinity out of ten. That line belongs to the September 13, 2010 entry and is preserved as part of its visible record. The restored page does not replace it with another score or present the line as an independent judgment.
How many responses did each entry draw?
The October 4 entry shows one response. The September 13 Spiderman review shows two responses. The September 13 Halo entry shows three responses. These totals describe the responses printed beneath the captured pages. They do not establish total readership, and the response wording is not reproduced.
Does the record repeat what the entries said?
It repeats limited descriptions, titles, dates, counts, authorship details, the printed score line and response information. It does not reproduce any entry body, comment body or third-party forum post. The account screen name discussed in the October entry is also deliberately not repeated, so the record remains bounded by what the stored copies show.
Facts here were last confirmed on September 20, 2026. It presents GamerTrolls.com as a restored publication record, keeps the former blog separate from this page, and preserves the limits of the available material rather than filling missing passages with assumptions.
Where the facts were read from
Its facts come from Wayback Machine captures of the address together with the crawl listing. The blog pages come from captures made in 2011: the homepage of February 8, 2011, the October 4, 2010 entry of June 19, 2011, the About page and the September 13, 2010 review. The later page comes from the capture of April 3, 2025. Everything reproduced here comes from those copies alone. No entry body, comment body or third-party forum post is carried over, no commenter is named except where the archive itself printed a handle in place of a name, and no rating, review count or reader figure has been added. Where the stored page offered no answer, the record keeps the question open instead of answering for it. Final read: September 20, 2026.